> I understand what you are saying and I agree. However, the problem is > that your concern applies to a lot more code in the mmc core, but this > condition. We can easily agree on that :) > Don't get me wrong, I don't mind useful comments and good > documentation, but perhaps what we are really missing is a general mmc > documentation that describes how the core is working and in particular > the power-management part of it. That would be the ideal solution, no doubt. > Unfortunately, I don't think I will have the bandwidth currently to > work on this. Same here. Plus, I don't have a complete understanding of it. Obtaining this understanding and then write some docs about my findings would be awesome, of course. But -EBUSY, too... > That said, I am going to apply the $subject patch as is - but feel I still think that having the comment is better than not having it, but I accept your decision and will still be happy that we finally solved the power-off-notification issue \o/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
