> @@ -2187,11 +2198,12 @@ static int mmc_shutdown(struct mmc_host *host) > int err = 0; > > /* > - * In a specific case for poweroff notify, we need to resume the card > - * before we can shutdown it properly. > + * If the card remains suspended at this point and it was done by using > + * the sleep-cmd (CMD5), we may need to re-initialize it first, to allow > + * us to send the preferred poweroff-notification cmd at shutdown. > */ > if (mmc_can_poweroff_notify(host->card) && > - !(host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_FULL_PWR_CYCLE)) > + !mmc_host_can_poweroff_notify(host, true)) Ooookay, I think I got this logic now. I think it makes sense to make it more explicit in the comment, though: "This is then the case when the card is able to handle poweroff notifications in general but the host could not initiate those for suspend." Something like this?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
