Joel Halpern <jmh.direct@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> My first reaction was to say that I can live with that. But then I stopped
> and thought about internationalized email addresses, where depending on the
> language I may not even be able to tell two very different email name-parts
> apart for different people. It would seem to suffice to include the name in
> the same form than in the header block. While I may not know which X. Xu
> this one is, expecting the contact information to resolve that is asking too
> much. (And if I need to, there are ways to investigate further. Fair
> enough.)
The indirection through the DT and/or ORCID would resolve the problem X.Xu
it's about. Or, actually, even just the link itself would tell you, if you
were looking at two documents, if they are the same person.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
