Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The main requirement I see here is 'Fred reads a draft written by Doug and
>> wants to extend the work, before publishing his proposal, he wants to
>> contact Fred to discuss the proposal but Fred has changed employers three
>> times'.
> Why not use ORCID?
I think we probably should. I got a number a few years ago, and if there is
an official way to include this in my I-Ds, I'll happily do that.
I was trying to understand how it's governed and funded.
I didn't quite muddle through all the governance pages, I did figure out that
it's US incorporated, probably in the state of NY. I am concerned that it
might come under attack. That the data privacy laws are US ones. Someone at
a European GDPR-compliant institution would ideally review to see if there
are issues.
I also get the impression that the IETF/LLC ought to making a contribution to
ORCID if we are going to use it on a day-to-day basis.
Would be nice to get PHB's JScontact info via ORCID API in addition to
naturally including one's ORCID in your JScontact.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
