> > > if (rate < RTCA0SCMP_MIN || rate > FIELD_MAX(RTCA0SCMP_MASK) + 1) > > > > > > ? > > > > You really think this is more readable than the original code? I am > > really tired of bike-shedding so I don't care much, but I do wonder... > > I don't mind the literal 32000, but the "> BIT(22)" looks rather > obscure, IMO. Really? Ok, then it is up to what Alexandre prefers, I guess...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
