On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 at 22:41, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 4/4/25 4:59 AM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote: > > "rpmhpd" is not documented nor used anywhere. As the enable-method is > > "psci" use "psci" for the power-domain name. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > "psci" is what we want here, but these platforms require some more > massaging.. So this isn't for CPU performance scaling? > > These SoCs don't seem to have any PSCI idle states (deeper than WFI) > described, which is no bueno, as they support some.. If PSCI PC mode is the only supported CPU suspend mode, we don't need the power-domain topology to be described in DT as it's optional to use. Is this a PC or OSI based platform? > > I'll try to improve this. > > Konrad > Kind regards Uffe
