On 4/7/25 6:27 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 at 22:41, Konrad Dybcio > <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 4/4/25 4:59 AM, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote: >>> "rpmhpd" is not documented nor used anywhere. As the enable-method is >>> "psci" use "psci" for the power-domain name. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> "psci" is what we want here, but these platforms require some more >> massaging.. > > So this isn't for CPU performance scaling? Nope! > >> >> These SoCs don't seem to have any PSCI idle states (deeper than WFI) >> described, which is no bueno, as they support some.. > > If PSCI PC mode is the only supported CPU suspend mode, we don't need > the power-domain topology to be described in DT as it's optional to > use. > > Is this a PC or OSI based platform? Unfortunately it seems like only PC mode is implemented. Konrad
