On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 14:49, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 7:30 AM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 12:36:33PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Apr 2025 at 05:06, Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > The "power-domains" and "power-domains-names" properties are missing any > > > > constraints. Add the constraints and drop the generic descriptions. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml | 8 ++------ > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml > > > > index 6f74ebfd38df..5bd5822db8af 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.yaml > > > > @@ -313,19 +313,15 @@ properties: > > > > maxItems: 1 > > > > > > > > power-domains: > > > > - description: > > > > - List of phandles and PM domain specifiers, as defined by bindings of the > > > > - PM domain provider (see also ../power_domain.txt). > > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > > > > There are more than one in some cases. The most is probably three, I think. > > > > > > > +1, there are users using "perf" and "psci" together now. > > Where? That's just wrong. For SCMI for example, but other QC platforms use it too. "psci" is for CPU power management - we discussed the bad name "psci" before, but as it's already widely deployed maybe leave it as is? A better name would be "power", or something along those lines. "perf" is for CPU performance scaling. Kind regards Uffe
