Re: [PATCH RFC INTERNAL v2 1/4] soc: renesas: Kconfig: Enable SoCs by default when ARCH_RENESAS is set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Prabhakar,

On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 17:37, Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 4:16 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 at 20:33, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Enable various Renesas SoCs by default when ARCH_RENESAS is selected.
> > > Adding default y if ARCH_RENESAS to the relevant configurations removes
> > > the need to manually enable individual SoCs in defconfig files.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks for your patch!
> >
> > > --- a/drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig
> > > @@ -65,17 +65,20 @@ if ARM && ARCH_RENESAS
> >
> > Note that this whole block already depends on ARCH_RENESAS...
> > I forgot about the reason, but commit 8070ba6348608aa1 ("ARM: shmobile:
> > fix build regressions") reminded me.  This is also the reason why we
> > cannot open the block for COMPILE_TEST in general.
> >
> > >
> > >  config ARCH_EMEV2
> > >         bool "ARM32 Platform support for Emma Mobile EV2"
> > > +       default y if ARCH_RENESAS
> >
> > ... so the "if ..." part is not really needed for arm32 SoCs.
> >
> Ok, got you.
>
> > > @@ -197,6 +216,7 @@ if ARM64
> >
> > Note that unlike on arm32, the arm64 (and riscv) block does not depend
> > on ARCH_RENESAS, so the "if ARCH_RENESAS" part is needed.
> To keep it consistent would you prefer `if ARM64 && ARCH_RENESAS` to
> be added and then all of the SoCs can just have `default y
> ARCH_RENESAS`.

I am still undecided. On one side, I like symmetry; on the other side,
I like opening up as much as possible for compile-testing.

Note that apart from a scary "WARNING: unmet direct dependencies
detected for PM", an m68k allmodconfig kernel builds fine after

    -if ARM64
    +if ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux