On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 10:37:01PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > + - const: renesas,r9a06g032-i2c > > > + - const: renesas,rzn1-i2c > > > > I don't really understand the rzn1/r9a06g032 difference here. Why are > > both needed? > > From our experience with Renesas R-Car, we concluded to have a binding > for the SoC and one for the family it belongs to. > > For example, the already upstream watchdog bindings: > > - items: > - enum: > - renesas,r9a06g032-wdt # RZ/N1D > - const: renesas,rzn1-wdt # RZ/N1 > > I could add the comments here as well if that helps? I think that would be helpful, to explain the relationship between the devices. With it Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
