On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 09:59:12AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > So far, no differences are known, so it can fallback to the default > compatible. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > If everyone is OK with this patch, does anyone mind if I shortcut it > into the v6.15 mergewindow? It is just a documentation update and would > simplify upstreaming the I2C chain for this board. One dependency less. > > .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml > index e5d05263c45a..87eea87bdd52 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/snps,designware-i2c.yaml > @@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ properties: > oneOf: > - description: Generic Synopsys DesignWare I2C controller > const: snps,designware-i2c > + - description: Renesas RZ/N1D I2C controller > + items: > + - const: renesas,r9a06g032-i2c > + - const: renesas,rzn1-i2c I don't really understand the rzn1/r9a06g032 difference here. Why are both needed? > + - const: snps,designware-i2c > - description: Microsemi Ocelot SoCs I2C controller > items: > - const: mscc,ocelot-i2c > -- > 2.47.2 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
