Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: i2c: snps,designware-i2c: describe Renesas RZ/N1D variant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > +          - const: renesas,r9a06g032-i2c
> > +          - const: renesas,rzn1-i2c
> 
> I don't really understand the rzn1/r9a06g032 difference here. Why are
> both needed?

From our experience with Renesas R-Car, we concluded to have a binding
for the SoC and one for the family it belongs to.

For example, the already upstream watchdog bindings:

      - items:
          - enum:
              - renesas,r9a06g032-wdt    # RZ/N1D
          - const: renesas,rzn1-wdt      # RZ/N1

I could add the comments here as well if that helps?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux