On 17/06/2025 09:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 12:38:36PM GMT, Prabhakar wrote: >> From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Document support for the I2C Bus Interface (RIIC) found on the Renesas >> RZ/N2H (R9A09G087) SoC. The RIIC IP on this SoC is identical to that on >> the RZ/T2H SoC so `renesas,riic-r9a09g077` will be used as a fallback >> compatible. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,riic.yaml | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,riic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,riic.yaml >> index 86d79e167547..6876eade431b 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,riic.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/renesas,riic.yaml >> @@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ properties: >> - renesas,riic-r9a09g057 # RZ/V2H(P) >> - renesas,riic-r9a09g077 # RZ/T2H >> >> + - items: >> + - const: renesas,riic-r9a09g087 # RZ/N2H >> + - const: renesas,riic-r9a09g077 # RZ/T2H > > Where is an entry renesas,riic-r9a09g077 alone? Please add complete > bindings, not half-patch and then next time second half. Ah, sorry, I saw it in patch #2 (the tooling I use jumped straight to patch #3 so that's the reason). Anyway, this should be squashed with #2, because it is trivial and entire 4 lines of commit msg plus 3 reviews is really too much for something like that. Don't inflate work for us. Best regards, Krzysztof
