Hi Frank, > > + clock-names: > > + oneOf: > > + - items: > > + - const: pclk > > + - const: tclk > > + - items: > > + - const: pclk > > + - const: pclkrw > > + - const: tclk > > Suggested clock name is, apb, trans, srfs. > Needn't clk surfix and provide meanful name. ? Why can't we have the name from the datasheets? It will be unnecessarily hard for users to verify the correctness of the clock assignments if they need an artifical mapping of these names. If they are the same as in the datasheet, the same task becomes very easy.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
