On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 12:04 PM Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > +cc CoC. > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:54:18AM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:44 AM Lorenzo Stoakes > > <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > You are purposefully engaging in malicious compliance here, this isn't how > > > things work. > > > > This accusation of yours is NOT: > > - Using welcoming and inclusive language > > - Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences > > - Showing empathy towards other community members > > > > This is also not constructive criticism. It's just a personal attack. > > It is absolutely none of these things, you admitted yourself you thought the > review was stupid and you used an LLM to adhere to it, clearly with bad faith > itnent. There must be a huge misunderstanding somewhere. I and you guys must be talking in a completely different language. None of that is true from my perspective. I never called any review stupid, nor did I admit that. I disagreed, but that's not the same thing. Remember when I told you "Let's agree to disagree"? It's perfectly fine to have different opinions. Please don't mix that up. > > > > (I'm also still waiting for your reply to > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKPOu+8esz_C=-m1+-Uip3ynbLm1geutJc7ip56mNJTOpm0BPA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > ) > > Your behaviour there was appalling and clearly a personal attack. It was not. Maybe you felt that way, but I did not intend you to feel that way. I would like to find out why you felt that way (because I don't have the slightest clue), that's why I asked, and why I'm waiting for your reply. If you would reply, maybe we could clear things up and resolve the misunderstanding. It sounds like I won't ever have the chance to do that, so... farewell.
