Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
From: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 11:54:18 +0200
Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, david@xxxxxxxxxx, axelrasmussen@xxxxxxxxxx, yuanchu@xxxxxxxxxx, willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hughd@xxxxxxxxxx, mhocko@xxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, Liam.Howlett@xxxxxxxxxx, vbabka@xxxxxxx, rppt@xxxxxxxxxx, surenb@xxxxxxxxxx, vishal.moola@xxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, deller@xxxxxx, agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, luto@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, chris@xxxxxxxxxx, jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, weixugc@xxxxxxxxxx, baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx, shakeel.butt@xxxxxxxxx, thuth@xxxxxxxxxx, broonie@xxxxxxxxxx, osalvador@xxxxxxx, jfalempe@xxxxxxxxxx, mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nysal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <f065d6ae-c7a7-4b43-9a7d-47b35adf944e@lucifer.local>

On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:44 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You are purposefully engaging in malicious compliance here, this isn't how
> things work.

This accusation of yours is NOT:
- Using welcoming and inclusive language
- Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
- Showing empathy towards other community members

This is also not constructive criticism. It's just a personal attack.

(I'm also still waiting for your reply to
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKPOu+8esz_C=-m1+-Uip3ynbLm1geutJc7ip56mNJTOpm0BPA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  - From: Lorenzo Stoakes

References:
- [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  - From: Max Kellermann
- Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
  - From: Lorenzo Stoakes

Prev by Date: [GIT PULL] fuse fixes for 6.17-rc5
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]