+cc CoC. On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:54:18AM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote: > On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:44 AM Lorenzo Stoakes > <lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You are purposefully engaging in malicious compliance here, this isn't how > > things work. > > This accusation of yours is NOT: > - Using welcoming and inclusive language > - Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences > - Showing empathy towards other community members > > This is also not constructive criticism. It's just a personal attack. It is absolutely none of these things, you admitted yourself you thought the review was stupid and you used an LLM to adhere to it, clearly with bad faith itnent. You have had 3 or 4 VERY BUSY maintainers take time to review your series and you have behaved appallingly in response since. I and others have been ENORMOUSLY patient in view of your awful behaviour, which you are continuing, and apparently escalating. So at this stage I'm not really interested in seeing any further iterations of this series from you for the parts of mm I maintain. I suggest you find another part of the kernel to work upon. > > (I'm also still waiting for your reply to > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKPOu+8esz_C=-m1+-Uip3ynbLm1geutJc7ip56mNJTOpm0BPA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > ) Your behaviour there was appalling and clearly a personal attack. It didn't warrant a response. I was trying to be patient with you and to see if we could move past that and have a viable series. You are very clearly in bad faith and looking for a fight - this is not professional and this is not the place for it. I have now spent my morning dealing wtih this and I'm done thanks.
