Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] mm: establish const-correctness for pointer parameters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01.09.25 12:20, Max Kellermann wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 12:04 PM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+cc CoC.

On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 11:54:18AM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 11:44 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
<lorenzo.stoakes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You are purposefully engaging in malicious compliance here, this isn't how
things work.

This accusation of yours is NOT:
- Using welcoming and inclusive language
- Being respectful of differing viewpoints and experiences
- Showing empathy towards other community members

This is also not constructive criticism. It's just a personal attack.

It is absolutely none of these things, you admitted yourself you thought the
review was stupid and you used an LLM to adhere to it, clearly with bad faith
itnent.

There must be a huge misunderstanding somewhere. I and you guys must
be talking in a completely different language. None of that is true
from my perspective.

I never called any review stupid, nor did I admit that. I disagreed,
but that's not the same thing. Remember when I told you "Let's agree
to disagree"? It's perfectly fine to have different opinions. Please
don't mix that up.


(I'm also still waiting for your reply to
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKPOu+8esz_C=-m1+-Uip3ynbLm1geutJc7ip56mNJTOpm0BPA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
)

Your behaviour there was appalling and clearly a personal attack.

It was not. Maybe you felt that way, but I did not intend you to feel
that way. I would like to find out why you felt that way (because I
don't have the slightest clue), that's why I asked, and why I'm
waiting for your reply. If you would reply, maybe we could clear
things up and resolve the misunderstanding.

It sounds like I won't ever have the chance to do that, so... farewell.

Let's all calm down a bit.

Max, I think this series here is valuable, and you can see that from the engagement from reviewers (this is a *good* thing, I sometimes wish I would get feedback that would help me improve my submissions).

So if you don't want to follow-up on this series to polish the patch descriptions etc,, let me now and I (or someone else around here) can drag it over the finishing line.

--
Cheers

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux