Jay Daley <exec-director@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Are you okay with an RFC having *ONLY* an ORCID?
>>
>> We only solve sob@harvard and the problem of deadnames by leaving all of
>> those out of the document.
> Apart from the aggregator benefit that ORCID provides, how would this
> be any different from RFCs pointing to Datatracker profiles for
> authors?
I'm okay with doing that.
Is it okay to have *JUST* that link?
Can we add an ORCID id to our profile? There are probably many informal
(adhoc) ways of doing this now.
I tried with the: editexternalresources, but it seems I can't just make up
new tags. I added it to my profile.
====
It might still be nice to do whatever dance ORCID would like so that the IETF
becomes a more clear source for ORCID.
It appears that for some publications, ORCID gets my info automagically.
I can otherwise update my list via adding via our doi... and maybe I'll
research the API for doing that.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
