Re: Travel Bans and IETF 127

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21 Mar 2025, at 3:24, Tobias Fiebig wrote:

> Moin,
>> The LLC however, will benefit from information as to how many people
>> know their likely plans and how those might affect meeting revenue.
>> Similarly the IESG will benefit from knowing whether such plans might
>> affect the utility of a meeting. That'd be best done in a survey,
>> e.g. to avoid the kind of you're-wrong/I'm-right messages we've just
>> seen,so I hope someone will announce that such surveying will happen.
>> (And there's no reason such a survey needs to be limited to one
>> meeting, it might be generally useful to know people's future travel
>> plans on an ongoing basis.)
>
> That is an excellent point. It seems like that, in the absence of such
> a survey, an alternate implementation of a survey was created in the
> mean time:
>
> https://boycott-ietf127.org/

Boycott is completely wrong word, and I don’t see any reason to boycott events organized by IETF.

FWIW, I will not sign such a statement, but will wholeheartedly support moving to another place, organizing multi-hub meeting or completely online.

Dean

>
> With best regards,
> Tobias





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux