On 7/17/25 8:01 AM, Jason Wang wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 1:55 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 10:03:00AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 8:04 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:47:52 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> This series implements VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support for vhost-net. This >>>>> feature is designed to improve the performance of the virtio ring by >>>>> optimizing descriptor processing. >>>>> >>>>> Benchmarks show a notable improvement. Please see patch 3 for details. >>>> >>>> You tagged these as net-next but just to be clear -- these don't apply >>>> for us in the current form. >>>> >>> >>> Will rebase and send a new version. >>> >>> Thanks >> >> Indeed these look as if they are for my tree (so I put them in >> linux-next, without noticing the tag). > > I think that's also fine. > > Do you prefer all vhost/vhost-net patches to go via your tree in the future? > > (Note that the reason for the conflict is because net-next gets UDP > GSO feature merged). FTR, I thought that such patches should have been pulled into the vhost tree, too. Did I miss something? Thanks, Paolo
