On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 9:52 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 7/17/25 8:01 AM, Jason Wang wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 1:55 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 10:03:00AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 8:04 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:47:52 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > >>>>> This series implements VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support for vhost-net. This > >>>>> feature is designed to improve the performance of the virtio ring by > >>>>> optimizing descriptor processing. > >>>>> > >>>>> Benchmarks show a notable improvement. Please see patch 3 for details. > >>>> > >>>> You tagged these as net-next but just to be clear -- these don't apply > >>>> for us in the current form. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Will rebase and send a new version. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >> > >> Indeed these look as if they are for my tree (so I put them in > >> linux-next, without noticing the tag). > > > > I think that's also fine. > > > > Do you prefer all vhost/vhost-net patches to go via your tree in the future? > > > > (Note that the reason for the conflict is because net-next gets UDP > > GSO feature merged). > > FTR, I thought that such patches should have been pulled into the vhost > tree, too. Did I miss something? See: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg1108896.html > > Thanks, > > Paolo > Thanks
