On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 02:01:06PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 1:55 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 10:03:00AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 8:04 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:47:52 +0800 Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > This series implements VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER support for vhost-net. This > > > > > feature is designed to improve the performance of the virtio ring by > > > > > optimizing descriptor processing. > > > > > > > > > > Benchmarks show a notable improvement. Please see patch 3 for details. > > > > > > > > You tagged these as net-next but just to be clear -- these don't apply > > > > for us in the current form. > > > > > > > > > > Will rebase and send a new version. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Indeed these look as if they are for my tree (so I put them in > > linux-next, without noticing the tag). > > I think that's also fine. > > Do you prefer all vhost/vhost-net patches to go via your tree in the future? > > (Note that the reason for the conflict is because net-next gets UDP > GSO feature merged). Whatever is easier really. Generally I do core vhost but if there is a conflict we can do net-next. > > > > But I also guess guest bits should be merged in the same cycle > > as host bits, less confusion. > > Work for me, I will post guest bits. > > Thanks > > > > > -- > > MST > >
