Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: renesas: r9a06g032: rework UARTs

To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: renesas: r9a06g032: rework UARTs
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 15:17:28 +0200
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx>, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAMuHMdUVqCfFQn5tvONWqmz-NerB7aVqj2_jythEPW51wEN3jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mail-followup-to: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx>, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20250414111218.7641-4-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <CAMuHMdUVqCfFQn5tvONWqmz-NerB7aVqj2_jythEPW51wEN3jQ@mail.gmail.com>

> So I am in favour of not renumbering the UARTs.

Fine with me, I'll resend the latter patch adding the new port as uart2.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [RFC PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: renesas: r9a06g032: rework UARTs
  - From: Wolfram Sang
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: renesas: r9a06g032: rework UARTs
  - From: Geert Uytterhoeven