Hi Wolfram,
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 10:33, Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > - - enum:
> > - - renesas,r9a06g032-uart
> > - - renesas,r9a06g033-uart
> > + - {}
>
> What about simply dropping r9a06g033 which cannot run Linux (no RAM
> controller, only 6MB internal RAM) and there hasn't been any upstreaming
You can run Linux on 6 MiB of RAM, if you try hard ;-)
> effort for other OS in the last 7 years? And making the remaining
... which does not mean there are no users.
> r9a06g032 just const? Why should we allow everything there? Do we want
> to support that?
We don't allow "everything". Valid compatible values are checked by
the normal rules below.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
