> > > +config SERIAL_RZ_SCI > > > > I think this name is too generic. Most RZ-variants so far do not have this > > SoC. Would 'RZT2H' work or is it too narrow then? > > This is too narrow, because for instance the RZ/N2H , which is very similar, has the same SCI You know the differences better, what could be a suitable name? > > > #define PORT_GENERIC (-1) > > > > Does userspace need to know this port? Can't we use PORT_GENERIC? > > Userspace unlikely needs it. But unfortunately, the port type needs to > be checked at a number (5) of places in the driver, so the definition > is needed. Yes, true. You just keep consistent with the driver. OK.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
