> +config SERIAL_RZ_SCI
I think this name is too generic. Most RZ-variants so far do not have
this SoC. Would 'RZT2H' work or is it too narrow then?
> + SCIx_RZT2H_SCI_REGTYPE,
This name is better.
> struct plat_sci_port {
> - unsigned int type; /* SCI / SCIF / IRDA / HSCIF */
> + unsigned int type; /* SCI / SCIF / IRDA / HSCIF / RZSCI */
"RZT2" in the comment as well.
> +/* SH-SCI */
> +#define PORT_RZSCI 124
> +
> /* Generic type identifier for ports which type is not important to userspace. */
> #define PORT_GENERIC (-1)
Does userspace need to know this port? Can't we use PORT_GENERIC?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
