Hi Krzysztof, Conor, Geert > > > v1 -> v2 > > > - add empty enum to avoid allowing invalid use. > > > > I don't understand why do you need this. Where is any user of it? There > > is no such in this patchset, so this must be explicitly explained in the > > commit msg. (snip) > > We don't allow such cases because it is pointless. > > > > Otherwise explain in the commit msg why this is needed, why exception is > > justified. > > > > You have entire commit msg to explain anything unusual and if you look > > at source code you will not notice such syntax for boards, so clearly > > this is unusual. > > They have a soc driver that binds to the compatible, which is why I > suggested this rather than refusing the patch. I do agree it should be > mentioned though. OK, let's skip this patch and post it with both SoC and Board name. Which was my original plan. Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto
