Hi Morimoto-san,
On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 at 01:03, Kuninori Morimoto
<kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > config SYSC_R8A7791
> > > - bool "System Controller support for R8A7791/R8A7793 (R-Car M2-W/N)" if COMPILE_TEST
> > > + bool "System Controller support for R8A7791 (R-Car M2-W)" if COMPILE_TEST
> > > select SYSC_RCAR
> > >
> > > config SYSC_R8A7792
> > > bool "System Controller support for R8A7792 (R-Car V2H)" if COMPILE_TEST
> > > select SYSC_RCAR
> > >
> > > +config SYSC_R8A7793
> > > + bool "System Controller support for R8A7793 (R-Car M2-N)" if COMPILE_TEST
> > > + select SYSC_RCAR
> > > +
> > > config SYSC_R8A7794
> > > bool "System Controller support for R8A7794 (R-Car E2)" if COMPILE_TEST
> > > select SYSC_RCAR
> >
> > When configuring the kernel for a Renesas platform, all SYSC_* symbols
> > are invisible symbols, which are auto-selected when needed. So I see
> > no need to complicate this internal invisible logic.
>
> Hmm ? Yes, but it is for Renesas case.
> non-Renesas can select it, because it has "if COMPILE_TEST" ?
>
> I can see like this (via x86)
>
> ...
> [*] System Controller support for R8A7779 (R-Car H1)
> [*] System Controller support for R8A7790 (R-Car H2)
> => [*] System Controller support for R8A7791/R8A7793 (R-Car M2-W/N)
> [*] System Controller support for R8A7792 (R-Car V2H)
> [*] System Controller support for R8A7794 (R-Car E2)
> ...
Is that really a problem? This is shown only when compile-testing.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
