This checkpatch warning makes sense here: "ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error
code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP" We don't have a userspace interface yet, but we
probably will get one. So, let's convert these error codes now, before
it will be forgotten in the future, and they could slip through to
applications.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c b/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c
index 611c22b72c15..91429d94a866 100644
--- a/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c
+++ b/drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c
@@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static int dw_i3c_master_priv_xfers(struct i3c_dev_desc *dev,
return 0;
if (i3c_nxfers > master->caps.cmdfifodepth)
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
for (i = 0; i < i3c_nxfers; i++) {
if (i3c_xfers[i].rnw)
@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static int dw_i3c_master_priv_xfers(struct i3c_dev_desc *dev,
if (ntxwords > master->caps.datafifodepth ||
nrxwords > master->caps.datafifodepth)
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
xfer = dw_i3c_master_alloc_xfer(master, i3c_nxfers);
if (!xfer)
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ static int dw_i3c_master_i2c_xfers(struct i2c_dev_desc *dev,
return 0;
if (i2c_nxfers > master->caps.cmdfifodepth)
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
for (i = 0; i < i2c_nxfers; i++) {
if (i2c_xfers[i].flags & I2C_M_RD)
@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ static int dw_i3c_master_i2c_xfers(struct i2c_dev_desc *dev,
if (ntxwords > master->caps.datafifodepth ||
nrxwords > master->caps.datafifodepth)
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
xfer = dw_i3c_master_alloc_xfer(master, i2c_nxfers);
if (!xfer)
--
2.47.2
