On 5/7/2025 4:13 PM, 'Andrea della Porta' via
BCM-KERNEL-FEEDBACK-LIST,PDL wrote:
Hi Florian
On 09:32 Wed 07 May , Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 5/6/2025 10:49 PM, Andrea della Porta wrote:
Hi Florian,
On 20:53 Tue 22 Apr , Andrea della Porta wrote:
The RP1 found on Raspberry Pi 5 board needs an external crystal at 50MHz.
Add clk_rp1_xosc node to provide that.
Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
A gentle reminder for patches 8 through 12 of this series, which I guess
would ideally be taken by you. Since the merge window is approaching, do
you think it's feasible to iterate a second pull request to Arnd with my
patches too?
With respect to your devicetree/next branch, my patches have the following
conflicts:
PATCH 9:
- arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dts: &pcie1 and &pcie2
reference at the end, my patch was rebased on linux-next which has them
while your devicetree branch has not. This is trivial to fix too.
PATCH 9 and 10:
- arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile on your branch has a line recently
added by Stefan's latest patch for RPi2. The fix is trivial.
PATCH 11 and 12:
- arch/arm64/configs/defconfig: just a couple of fuzz lines.
Please let me know if I should resend those patches adjusted for your tree.
Yes please resend them today or tomorrow so I can send them the following
day. Thanks
Sorry, what's the best wasy to provide the updated patch 8 to 12 to you?
1) Resend the entire patchset (V10) with relevant patches updated
2) Send only updated patches 8 through 12 (maybe as an entirely new patchset with
only those specific patches)
Either of those two options would work. Maybe let's do option 2) in the
interest of keeping the traffic low for people.
--
Florian
