Hi Florian On 09:32 Wed 07 May , Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > On 5/6/2025 10:49 PM, Andrea della Porta wrote: > > Hi Florian, > > > > On 20:53 Tue 22 Apr , Andrea della Porta wrote: > > > The RP1 found on Raspberry Pi 5 board needs an external crystal at 50MHz. > > > Add clk_rp1_xosc node to provide that. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrea della Porta <andrea.porta@xxxxxxxx> > > > Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > A gentle reminder for patches 8 through 12 of this series, which I guess > > would ideally be taken by you. Since the merge window is approaching, do > > you think it's feasible to iterate a second pull request to Arnd with my > > patches too? > > > > With respect to your devicetree/next branch, my patches have the following > > conflicts: > > > > PATCH 9: > > - arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm2712-rpi-5-b.dts: &pcie1 and &pcie2 > > reference at the end, my patch was rebased on linux-next which has them > > while your devicetree branch has not. This is trivial to fix too. > > > > PATCH 9 and 10: > > - arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/Makefile on your branch has a line recently > > added by Stefan's latest patch for RPi2. The fix is trivial. > > > > PATCH 11 and 12: > > - arch/arm64/configs/defconfig: just a couple of fuzz lines. > > > > Please let me know if I should resend those patches adjusted for your tree. > > Yes please resend them today or tomorrow so I can send them the following > day. Thanks Sorry, what's the best wasy to provide the updated patch 8 to 12 to you? 1) Resend the entire patchset (V10) with relevant patches updated 2) Send only updated patches 8 through 12 (maybe as an entirely new patchset with only those specific patches) 3) Asking you to pull teh relevant commit from my own git repo Many thanks, Andrea > -- > Florian >
