On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 02:50:19PM +0200, Caleb Connolly wrote: > > > On 4/14/25 10:04, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:09:12AM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya Chundru wrote: > > > Move the phy, phy-names, wake-gpio's to the pcie root port node instead of > > > the bridge node, as agreed upon in multiple places one instance is[1]. > > > > > > Update the qcom,pcie-common.yaml to include the phy, phy-names, and > > > wake-gpios properties in the root port node. There is already reset-gpio > > > defined for PERST# in pci-bus-common.yaml, start using that property > > > instead of perst-gpio. > > > > > > For backward compatibility, do not remove any existing properties in the > > > bridge node. > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20241211192014.GA3302752@bhelgaas/ > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-common.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > .../devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-sc7280.yaml | 17 +++++++++++++---- > > > 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-common.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-common.yaml > > > index 0480c58f7d998adbac4c6de20cdaec945b3bab21..16e9acba1559b457da8a8a9dda4a22b226808f86 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-common.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie-common.yaml > > > @@ -85,6 +85,24 @@ properties: > > > opp-table: > > > type: object > > > +patternProperties: > > > + "^pcie@": > > > + type: object > > > + $ref: /schemas/pci/pci-pci-bridge.yaml# > > > + > > > + properties: > > > + reg: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + > > > + phys: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + > > > + wake-gpios: > > > + description: GPIO controlled connection to WAKE# signal > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + > > > + unevaluatedProperties: false > > > > Please mark old properties as deprecated. > > Since this is a trivial change, just moving two properties, I don't see why > it makes sense to deprecate -- just remove the old properties, and move over > all the platforms at once. > This will be an ABI break. You should not remove properties all of a sudden without first deprecating them (even if you convert all upstream DTS at once). ABI is for older DTS also. - Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
