Hello, On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 07:24:45AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: ... > I fairly routinely get patches fixing manual TOCs that are not updated > to match changes elsewhere. We have a nice system that can manage the > TOC automatically for us, it seems best to me to use it. > > That said, if having the TOC in the plain-text version of the document > is deemed to be important, then it needs to be kept and manually > maintained. Wouldn't it be better to have some automated script which triggers on mismatching TOC so that these get fixed up. I think people (including me) do read the plain text version, so it'd be a shame if we lose TOC in the source file. Thanks. -- tejun