On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 07:24:45AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 02:23:34PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> manually-arranged table of contents (as reST comments) gets out-of-sync > >> with actual toctree as not all of these are added to it. > > > > Is this true? I generated HTML with this patch and the resulting ToC > > matches what's in the comment. > > > >> Replace it with automatically-generated table of contents via contents:: > >> directive. > > > > Mauro, what's the best practice wrt consistent ToC and having it in > > plaintext form? > > I fairly routinely get patches fixing manual TOCs that are not updated > to match changes elsewhere. We have a nice system that can manage the > TOC automatically for us, it seems best to me to use it. > > That said, if having the TOC in the plain-text version of the document > is deemed to be important, then it needs to be kept and manually > maintained. So for the v2, should I fix up the manual toctree to match autogenerated one? Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
