Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 02:23:34PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> manually-arranged table of contents (as reST comments) gets out-of-sync >> with actual toctree as not all of these are added to it. > > Is this true? I generated HTML with this patch and the resulting ToC > matches what's in the comment. > >> Replace it with automatically-generated table of contents via contents:: >> directive. > > Mauro, what's the best practice wrt consistent ToC and having it in > plaintext form? I fairly routinely get patches fixing manual TOCs that are not updated to match changes elsewhere. We have a nice system that can manage the TOC automatically for us, it seems best to me to use it. That said, if having the TOC in the plain-text version of the document is deemed to be important, then it needs to be kept and manually maintained. Thanks, jon
