On 10/09/2025 09:54, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 12:12:12PM +0200, Clément Le Goffic wrote:
From: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
LPDDR and DDR bindings are SDRAM types and are likely to share the same
properties (at least for density, io-width and reg).
To avoid bindings duplication, factorise the properties.
The compatible description has been updated because the MR (Mode
registers) used to get manufacturer ID and revision ID are not present
in case of DDR.
Those information should be in a SPD (Serial Presence Detect) EEPROM in
case of DIMM module or are known in case of soldered memory chips as
they are in the datasheet of the memory chips.
Signed-off-by: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Is this email defunct now, that you add second SoB?
Signed-off-by: Clément Le Goffic <legoffic.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi Krzysztof,
I still see in this patchset around 5 different subsystems. Nothing in
the cover letter explains the dependencies, so grouping looks like
coincidence and you just make it difficult for maintainers for no
reason.
Please organize your patchsets per subsystems, see submitting patches
doc for more details.
Yes I agree it is a big series.
I'll split it according to each subsystem it targets.
Best regards,
Clément
