On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 12:12:12PM +0200, Clément Le Goffic wrote: > From: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > LPDDR and DDR bindings are SDRAM types and are likely to share the same > properties (at least for density, io-width and reg). > To avoid bindings duplication, factorise the properties. > > The compatible description has been updated because the MR (Mode > registers) used to get manufacturer ID and revision ID are not present > in case of DDR. > Those information should be in a SPD (Serial Presence Detect) EEPROM in > case of DIMM module or are known in case of soldered memory chips as > they are in the datasheet of the memory chips. > > Signed-off-by: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@xxxxxxxxxxx> Is this email defunct now, that you add second SoB? > Signed-off-by: Clément Le Goffic <legoffic.clement@xxxxxxxxx> I still see in this patchset around 5 different subsystems. Nothing in the cover letter explains the dependencies, so grouping looks like coincidence and you just make it difficult for maintainers for no reason. Please organize your patchsets per subsystems, see submitting patches doc for more details. Best regards, Krzysztof
