On 10/09/2025 10:41, Clément Le Goffic wrote: > On 10/09/2025 09:54, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 12:12:12PM +0200, Clément Le Goffic wrote: >>> From: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> LPDDR and DDR bindings are SDRAM types and are likely to share the same >>> properties (at least for density, io-width and reg). >>> To avoid bindings duplication, factorise the properties. >>> >>> The compatible description has been updated because the MR (Mode >>> registers) used to get manufacturer ID and revision ID are not present >>> in case of DDR. >>> Those information should be in a SPD (Serial Presence Detect) EEPROM in >>> case of DIMM module or are known in case of soldered memory chips as >>> they are in the datasheet of the memory chips. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Is this email defunct now, that you add second SoB? > > Yes, but I still want to upstream it and was thinking to keep the > "original" author even if it is me. > Am I wrong here ? What should I do ? It's fine, I just wanted to clarify this. Best regards, Krzysztof
