On Tue, 09 Sep 2025 10:18:01 +0100, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 08 2025 at 17:31, Marc Zyngier wrote: [...] > > @@ -69,6 +90,8 @@ void of_phandle_args_to_fwspec(struct device_node *np, const u32 *args, > > * @translate: Given @fwspec, decode the hardware irq number (@out_hwirq) and > > * linux irq type value (@out_type). This is a generalised @xlate > > * (over struct irq_fwspec) and is preferred if provided. > > + * @get_info: Given @info, report additional firmware-provided information. > > + * Optional. > > get_info() is pretty generic. Can we have some more descriptive name for > that? Also please keep the tabular formatting of the doc intact. Would get_fwspec_info() be descriptive enough? M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
