On Thu, Sep 11 2025 at 15:13, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Tue, 09 Sep 2025 10:18:01 +0100, > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Sep 08 2025 at 17:31, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > [...] > >> > @@ -69,6 +90,8 @@ void of_phandle_args_to_fwspec(struct device_node *np, const u32 *args, >> > * @translate: Given @fwspec, decode the hardware irq number (@out_hwirq) and >> > * linux irq type value (@out_type). This is a generalised @xlate >> > * (over struct irq_fwspec) and is preferred if provided. >> > + * @get_info: Given @info, report additional firmware-provided information. >> > + * Optional. >> >> get_info() is pretty generic. Can we have some more descriptive name for >> that? Also please keep the tabular formatting of the doc intact. > > Would get_fwspec_info() be descriptive enough? I think so
