On Thu, 2025-07-31 at 16:31 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2025, Rick P Edgecombe wrote: > > So STATUS_OPERAND_BUSY() seems like an ok thing to try next for v3 of this > > series at least. Unless anyone has any strong objections ahead of time. > > Can you make it IS_TDX_STATUS_OPERAND_BUSY() so that it's obviously a check and > not a statement/value, and to scope it to TDX? It's a mouthful, but I can live with it. Yea, it def should have TDX in the name.
