On Wed, Jul 30, 2025, Rick P Edgecombe wrote: > So STATUS_OPERAND_BUSY() seems like an ok thing to try next for v3 of this > series at least. Unless anyone has any strong objections ahead of time. Can you make it IS_TDX_STATUS_OPERAND_BUSY() so that it's obviously a check and not a statement/value, and to scope it to TDX?
