Re: AUTH48 and "Guidance for NIST Staff on Using Inclusive Language in Documentary Standards"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Benson,
At 01:00 AM 09-06-2025, Benson Muite wrote:
direction.  A workshop/program
driven by the IAB could bring in external stakeholders and a wider diversity of viewpoints - particularly from people for whom English is not the primary language but either participate in the IETF to a limited extent or would like to participate in the IETF more. Some terms used in English and considered inappropriate in English as used in the USA are used in other languages and do not carry the same connotations.

A draft that brings up the issue of translations:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-attoumani-ietf-inclusion/
This also of course has cost implications, even organizations such as the ITU and the UN have a limit to what
they can support.

The better party to discuss an IAB workshop with would be IAB members as they have first-hand experience. There is a contact address on the IAB web site.

If I am not mistaken, the draft which you mentioned above is being discussed in GENDISPATCH (it's an IETF working group).

I have not attended workshops, conferences, etc. where language is the main topic of discussion. There are other topics which requires a lot of reading and that takes up my time. As an example, I read RFC 5378 again over the past weekend. I also read two or three other RFCs which are related to a protocol.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux