Re: [122attendees] [123attendees] Toward Inclusive Participation – Community Dialogue on Venue Selection (draft-attoumani-ietf-inclusion)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Jun 9, 2025, at 9:40 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm=40labs.htt-consult.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/9/25 12:11 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> I think that WG chairs need more training.  The acknowledgement section in
>> RFCs is really the only public carrot that currently have, and we do not use
>> that very consistently.  Maybe that's a bug.
>> This goes beyond meeting selection concerns and whether or not they can physically attend.
> 
> Once upon a time I had my start in the IETF.  With TN3270E.  You would never know that I worked that group through to our RFCs as the chair.  No mention of me.  We did not do things that way back then. Then I was part of the 3rd pair of co-chairs for IPsec.  That was a trip!  That group ate up chairs.  No acks.
> 
> Authors and ADs should see to it that chairs at least get ACKs on the RFCs they pulled out of their workgroups.

+` 1 to both Michael’s and Robert's comments.

LL






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux