Hi,
> Noting the current title of the draft, and given that the text does not address moderation procedures,
It does address moderation procedures. Please see:
> I don’t believe that the draft fits with the charter for the MODPOD working group
OK, but my work is in the current MODPOD document already. It seems like I would know, given that I contribute to the document and have been in the IETF for 20+ years (yikes).
Only 3 commits, but usually the editors make the PR in response to GitHub issues.
> If there is community interest, you may wish to ask for a slot to present during the next Gendispatch session.
I would never do that unless I were truly unsure about where a document should go. In this case, it's not necessary for the document to move past an I-D. I think it should, but the I-D is enough to get the point across. I should fix some typos and write a few more caveats for our more literally minded participants.
I do find it humorous that one argument is "you don't have to read it" but also "this is generating too much traffic".
thanks,
Rob
