Magnus Nyström via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> writes: > The new statement is clearly better, but I still feel that the "and ideally > slowly when possible" part is needless and potentially confusing. [...] > So, while I would rather not include that sentence ending, it is no > longer an issue for me. Thanks Magnus. I suspect we should leave the text as at the moment as we have spent a fair amount of time on it and it's what the WG expressed as a sentiment as distilled as we can get. IE, it's the middle ground we can all live with. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
