Re: Barry's Question about NOMCOM interviews

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/21/2025 7:45 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
I agree with you that the NOMCOM is not required by the RFC to interview every candidate.  However, we were told that one reason to do so was that doing the cut of who we interview might actually take more time off the calendar than actually doing every interview because one needs a an agreed process for the cut, and it would contract the timelines for both questionnaire responses and community feedback.

Hi Eliot -

I find the above... sorry - a specious argument.  The criteria for "fail fast" in selecting people is something that can and should be done before you ever send out the "please volunteer" notices.  Then the only argument is whether or not some candidate meets those criteria, and the obvious answer if there's enough of a push back on someone not qualifying (by one or members of the nomcom voting group) is to move them to the "we're going to interview you" queue.

But - YMMV....

Best, Mike





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux