Re: Barry's Question about NOMCOM interviews

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



But here's the thing: You talk about someone filing an appeal as if it
were a terrible result.  It's not.  Someone said they didn't like <x>
and appealed it.  Presumably, the body appealed to said, "Sorry,
nothing improper here," and did not uphold the appeal.

That's working as designed, and nothing bad happened there.  The
simple fact that someone appealed does not, in itself, mean that
anyone did anything wrong.  We need to stop thinking about it that
way.

Barry

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 1:44 PM Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Going only with public knowledge, we had an appeal filed because someone did not submit their questionnaire (also not required per 8713) after our deadline.
>
>
>
> So, yup, I still think it would be “highly likely.”  I also know that when some candidates did not submit questionnaires we quietly breathed a sigh of relief because we did not want to interview them.
>
>
>
> The nomcom had several highly experienced IETF’ers.
>
>
>
>





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux