On Wed, Aug 20, 2025, at 23:10, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> The message itself reads like it could be read like: tell us and we >> might put the brakes on removing it (and that’s it). > > Yeah, that is a wrong interpretation we did not want to trigger. > > "If you are a developer of a script that uses whatchanged, then > rewrite it with 'log --raw --no-merges' and be happy. If the script > is very widely used, dropping us a note would be nice, as we can > redirect end-user inquiries of your script towards you. If you are > an end-user of such a script, bug your supplier of such a script. > Thanks." > > perhaps? That looks like it covers all the bases. Great. -- Kristoffer Haugsbakk
